The flag that Rick Monday saved in center field, Chavez Ravine
Onthis July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all itssymbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, itsinsistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed.
Um. No? Is that — is that the definition of nationalism? I don't... seem to remember it being quite defined in that way in my dictionary... Hmm. Mebbe I better look it up, again. Mr. Zinn is the intellectual history guy, after all.Is not nationalism — that devotion to a flag, an anthem, a boundaryso fierce it engenders mass murder — one of the great evils of ourtime, along with racism, along with religious hatred?
There's more. Make sure you have a q-tip with you to daub the blood leaking from your ear canals. If ever-a-wever there were a pundit wed to the straw man and the exception that proves the rule, it's our Mr. Zinn.Our citizenry has been brought up to see our nation as differentfrom others, an exception in the world, uniquely moral, expanding intoother lands in order to bring civilization, liberty, democracy.
That self-deception started early.
We see in Iraq that our soldiers are not different. They have,perhaps against their better nature, killed thousands of Iraqcivilians. And some soldiers have shown themselves capable ofbrutality, of torture.
Yet they are victims, too, of our government's lies.
How many times have we heard President Bush tell the troops that ifthey die, if they return without arms or legs, or blinded, it is for"liberty," for "democracy"?
One of the effects of nationalist thinking is a loss of a sense ofproportion. The killing of 2,300 people at Pearl Harbor becomes thejustification for killing 240,000 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
This, from a widely-read "history teacher." By "widely-read," I mean he is required reading in many history classes.* I don't mean to imply that I think Mr. Zinn is himself widely-read. He hasn't even studied (or has strangely overlooked) the obvious World War 2 Eastern-front strategies and tactics, let alone the subtler ones.
Oh, yeah. And by "history" — well, in Mr. Zinn's case, I'm not sure what I mean by that.
Thekilling of 3,000 people on Sept. 11 becomes the justification forkilling tens of thousands of people in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Shame on all those Islamists for killing tens of thousands in the name of the nation of America! — Er — Wait a minnit. I think I disagree with Mr. Zinn on their motivation... I'm not even sure they're nationalists.
Whoops.
And nationalism is given a special virulence when it is said to beblessed by Providence. Today we have a president, invading twocountries in four years, who announced on the campaign trail in 2004that God speaks through him.
I can't wait to look that last bit up. I can't immediately recall any furor erupting over Mr. Bush's "Prophet" plank in the GOP platform.
In their shadowy film noir minds, to assert allegiance to both the human race and a nation is impossible. Yet — the best of the United States of America is just that — the allegiance to a nation that itself asserts its allegiance to the human race. In Mr. Zinn's agit-prop mind, these World History Powers are morally equivalent. Ready?We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history.
We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation.