Wry WRY: What I Think About Whenever Someone Mentions the New York Times


I was lucky enough to be stuck in a waiting room for a few hours with a New York Times on Monday. I was getting the Mrs.' car windows tinted. After doing many things to avoid the Times, I ran out of gambits (writing poetry, making lists of things to do, going for a walk for an hour) and glanced it over.

And found this, after a few seconds.

In the USA, only the New York Times* could sincerely publish this leading Style section article, copiously illustrated, and not hear the laughter behind their heads:







Nope! No pretense there! No siree! Whenever I think of "all masculine" ways of wearing my coat, the first thing I think of is wearing it like a cape over my bared, shaved chest with one button done.

I know; I know. It makes me look like a rube when I mock such things. I admit it.



* Maybe the L.A. Times as well, but only because they are the N. Y. Times' lap-puppy, always whining and panting to catch up.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 
Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 30 Jun 2008, 7:39 PM Lumberjack wrote:
    Great googily moogily. I've seen camisoles more masculine than those guys.

    (my first choice of woman's undergarments for that sentence was discarded because I wasn't sure if 'crotchless' should be hyphenated)
    Reply to this
  • 2 Jul 2008, 2:24 AM rowan wrote:
    Hee hee! if you had read this at the beginning of your wait, it would have been one of those situations where you find yourself going for a walk and trying hard to keep from bursting into insane laughter in front of total strangers. I don't know why it would seem like insane laughter, but it always does. If the cause of laughter isn't obvious and shared. If I stifle laughter it always finds a way out somewhere even more inappropriate. Better to let it go.

    Anyway, sorry for the tangent. Have been moving house, and away from the internetz, and so have a week's worth of tangent-posting to catch up on. :o)

    Most of the blokes in the background look deeply ambivalent to the glut of manly apparel on show. I am a little disappointed, as this suggests that sales of the 'wraparound-cardigan sans shirt' jacket will be sparse, and I won't have an excuse for laughing in the street anytime soon.

    Thanks for this!
    Reply to this
    1. 2 Jul 2008, 6:57 AM WryMouth wrote:
      As long as there is "high fashion," Rowan, there will be snark on both sides of the run-way. Sad but true.

      Happy to have you settled in, or at least beginning to settle in, to your new digs.

      Reply to this
      1. 2 Jul 2008, 10:02 AM Laxsaltman wrote:
        Makes me a-wantin' to go out 'n get me one right now! Can Wry imagine Lax in one of those things?
        Reply to this
        1. 3 Jul 2008, 7:31 AM WryMouth wrote:
          you'd look FA-ABULOUSSS!!!

          Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.